BACK TO BBNovaRacing HOME PAGE

BBNovaRacing.com

Because old school is so cool
It is currently Apr Sat 05, 2025 6:02 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: physics question
PostPosted: Jan Thu 29, 2004 1:55 am 
Offline
Old Skool.
Old Skool.
User avatar

Joined: Jan Thu 01, 2004 6:04 am
Posts: 2563
I was reading some physics stuff tonight


Mostly Einsteins theory of Specialized Relativity

I'm confused on something. Maybe one of you guys know.....

I ran across this page
http://science.howstuffworks.com/relativity3.htm


Part of that page is this

Quote:
Let's take another trip with the twins, but this time John will travel 12 hours away and 12 hours back, as measured by his clock. Every hour he will send a radio signal to Hunter telling him the hour. A radio signal is just another form of electromagnetic radiation; therefore, it also travels at the speed of light. What do we get as John travels away from Hunter? When John's clock reads "1 hour" he sends the first signal. Because he is moving away from Hunter at 60% of the speed of light, the relativistic Doppler Effect causes Hunter to observe John's transmission to be ½ the source value. From our discussion above, ½ the frequency means the time it takes is twice as long, therefore, Hunter receives the John's "1 hour" signal when his clock reads "2 hours". When John sends his "2 hour" signal, Hunter receives it at hour 4 for him"


Now, I remember learning this in high school, but something isnt adding up for me.



Let's use half the speed of light in my example:

Twin A and Twin B

Both twins are next to eachother

A
B


Twin B travels at 1/2 the speed of light in a direction for 1 hour


A
......................B



Twin B shines a flashlight towards Twin A at that time

shouldnt twin A then see the light from twin Bs flashlight at 1.5 hours? (1 hour from when twin B turned the flashlight on + .5 hours for the light to travel to twin A from twin B


In that authors example twin B is traveling at 60% the speed of light. and the author is saying that it takes the light a whole hour to travel and hit twin A. how did light slow down? is that page just wrong?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Jan Thu 29, 2004 2:29 am 
Offline
V8 Pony car
V8 Pony car
User avatar

Joined: Jan Sun 25, 2004 6:04 pm
Posts: 681
Location: Maryland
Easy ....you are looking at both A and B as being static.

If B is "still in motion" at half the speed of light....you have just decreased the speed of the light beam by half.

A perfect real life example of this theory is the train whistle blowing as it is coming towards you. The pitch of the horn is high (compressed/accelerated) and once it passes it changes to a lower pitch. The actual frequency of the horn is when the train is directly in front of you.

Hope that helps.....hard to do in just a short message....but an attempt.

-Signed-
former H.S. Physics Olympian Competitor

_________________
-Eric Cary-
Sledgehammer Motorsports
Extreme Street - 1971 Dodge Dart


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Jan Thu 29, 2004 10:10 am 
Offline
Old Skool.
Old Skool.
User avatar

Joined: Jan Thu 01, 2004 6:04 am
Posts: 2563
hrmmm. according to the 2nd postlate, light is unaffected by the speed of whatever is shining the light

http://science.howstuffworks.com/relativity2.htm


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group